Skip to main content

Week 3 Journal

  1)    To what extent do we learn these ideas of right & wrong from our environment?  To what extent is this morality intrinsic, i.e., present in us from birth?
We as people learn what is right and wrong from how we were raised and also the environment and people we surround ourselves with. Morality is not with us at our birth. Children learn simple morals from their parents and teachers growing up. Simple morals such as please and thank you, sharing, treat others the way you wish to be treated, etc. If a child grew up learning from someone that it is okay to be disrespectful, they would learn it is okay. Bigger picture opinions are also learned from parents but also from the environment a child grows up in. For instance, if someone's parents have always believed that marriage should be between a man and a woman, the person is likely to take on the same morals. The environment a person is in has a big impact on morals too. An example of this is that a lot of people who live in rural areas will be less open to racial diversity because they aren't accustomed to it. Therefore many people who could be considered "racist" come from rural areas. 
2)    Are there actions you believe are always morally wrong? Which actions? Why or why not?
There are actions that I see as morally wrong. Purposely hurting an innocent person, whether it be harassment, rape, physically harming them or killing them, is never okay. There is an exception to this. I specify an innocent person because there are some instances that I feel are worthy of capital punishment. Another action I believe is always morally wrong is not being accepting of who someone is and who they love, unless they are hurting other people. I know this is a long statement, but for instance, LGBTQ people should be allowed to be who they are without harassment and homophobia, but pedophiles shouldn't. I would also consider women's rights as included in my morals, I think women should be treated equally to men and have the right to choose what we do with our own bodies. 
3)    Can one live morally without the guidance of religion? Why or why not?
People can live morally without the guidance of religion and a lot of people do, including myself. So, yes people can live morally without being religious because morals do not automatically mean religion. People choose to believe and be active in different religions and we are lucky to have that freedom, but religion does not play a huge part in my life. I realize that religion and morals go hand in hand for a majority of people especially here in the midwest, but the two words do not correspond in my mind. So much war and suffering has happened in the world because of people's religious beliefs and those people thinking their immoral choices are okay because of what they believe. Many conflicts and wars in history have happened because the two groups of people aren't okay with the others religion and it leaders to murder and genocide, which is exactly against one of my morals. One should always be accepting of who another person is unless said person's beliefs hurt people. 
4)    Is empathy the proper basis for morality? Why or why not?
Empathy is a very big part of morality but morality is not only based on empathy. One can have good morals without having a strong empathetic personality. It is important for a person to be sympathetic to understand good morals. I say this because just because a person isn't super empathetic doesn't mean they will understand morals less. I consider myself to be sympathetic but not empathetic, and I still understand respect and that I don't want to purposely hurt anyone. I feel for people, I just don't feel everything they feel unless I have personally been through their experience. 

Comments

  1. This was well thought out and written. I would suggest you reread your answer to the second question.
    When you claim something is always wrong and immediately bring up exceptions, it tends invalidate certainly that claim, as well as any other claim you make.
    I'm glad you made that distinction about accepting people; when unchecked, we find ourselves having to accept pedophiles and nazis. Not enough people consider that when saying they believe in widespread acceptance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Semester Review

It became easier Throughout the course of this semester, I’ve gone through many ups and downs with writing. After graduating from high school, I thought I was a pretty good writer. I took college compositive my senior year and got really good grades, so I wasn’t that worried about writing in college. Well let me tell you, I was knocked down a few pegs my freshman year of college. Now I think I’m an okay writer, but I definitely do struggle a bit. I took this class to fulfill requirements for my communication minor, and really I don’t plan on being a journalist, but I did learn skills in this class that will help me with writing in general during my future career.              I’ve learned how important non-biased writing is and how damaging biased writing can be on both the article and public opinion. When writing news articles as a journalist it’s incredibly important to double and triple-check that sources are very ...

Week 9 Journal

Definitions:  Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter- the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another. Deaths caused by negligence, attempts to kill, assaults to kill, suicides, and accidental deaths are excluded Aggravated assault- An unlawful attack by one person upon another for the purpose of inflicting severe or aggravated bodily injury. This type of assault usually is accompanied by the use of a weapon or by means likely to produce death or great bodily harm. Simple assaults are excluded.  Estimated  murder and nonnegligent manslaughter  Year California Oregon Washington 2000 2,079 70 196 2001 2,206 84 179 2002 2,395 72 184 2003 2,407 68 182 2004 2,392 90 190 2005 2,503 80 205 Totals:  Oregon- 464 California- 13,982 Washington- 1,136 With Estimated murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, California had the highest number of crimes within a five-year span. This is simply because California has the highest populati...

Week 4 Journal

Libel: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/09/13/its-important-to-stand-up-to-bullies-rebel-wilson-wins-record-amount-in-defamation-case/  Rebel Wilson was awarded 4.56 million dollars after she won a libel lawsuit against Bauer Media in Australia. She claimed they had published a story that fabricated her life and lied about her age, upbringing, and origin of her name. Wilson said after that it wasn't about the money for her and she planned on donating the money to charities. The defense was purely that they claimed it was the truth. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/09/19/552090031/fraternity-members-defamation-case-against-rolling-stone-can-proceed-court-says In 2017 Rolling stone was faced with a defamation suit after they published a story implying that three University of Virginia Phi Kappa Psi members allegedly took part in raping another student at a fraternity party. The article was written by Sabrina Rubin and was about t...